Papal honors given to faithful servants of diocese

Laura Keener, Editor.

Yellow and white flowers surrounded the altar, and yellow and white bunting draped the main portal door of the Cathedral Basilica of the Assumption, Sept. 28, for the celebration of the conferring of Papal Honors. Yellow and white are the colors of Vatican City and brightened the celebration of Pope Francis recognizing the service of 31 members of the Diocese of Covington to the Church. (See listing of names below.)

Four priests were elevated to Chaplain to His Holiness and now bear the title Monsignor. (from left) Msgr. Ronald Ketteler, Msgr. Gerald Reinersman, Msgr. Gerald Twaddell and Msgr. Daniel Vogelpohl.

Bishop Roger Foys had recommended four priests for the honor of Chaplain to His Holiness and the title of Monsignor, for their distinguished service and ministry to the Church. He also recommended two priests, a deacon, nine women religious and 19 lay faithful for the honor Pro-Ecclesia et Pontifice Cross, a papal award given in recognition of distinguished service to the local and universal Church.

As Bishop Foys began his homily, he acknowledged the peculiarities of the celebration — no choir, half the church empty and everyone wearing masks — due to pandemic restrictions. However, “the purpose and the reason for this celebration remains just as joyful and just as important,” he said.

Why papal honors? Why do we bestow papal honors? Why does the Holy Father who gives these papal honors give them to individuals? Are questions, Bishop Foys said, people may ask or be thinking. The answer, he said, can be summed up with four simple words that Blessed John Duns Scotus used to defend the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, “potuit, decuit, ergo fecit.”

Potuit — it is possible — it is possible for God to do this.

Decuit — it is fitting — after all, the Blessed Mother was the vessel who would bear the Savior of the world, Jesus Christ.

Ergo fecit — therefore he did it.

Bishop Foys holds a Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice Cross on a white and gold ribbon, ready to bestow it on one of the recipients.

“It was possible for the Holy Father to grant these awards and this recognition and it was possible for me to request it,” said Bishop Foys. “And it is fitting … every diocese in itself is a local Church but we are a part of something larger — we are part of the Universal Church. A celebration such as this recognizes our ties to the Seat of Peter and to our Holy Father. It is also fitting because we haven’t done this in many years and so it was time … Therefore, I did it and the Holy Father agreed.”

The Gospel reading for the Vespers service was taken from St. Paul’s letter to the Corinthians and the familiar passage where St. Paul compares the Church — the Body of Christ — to the human body. There are many distinct parts to the body and each are essential to the whole.

“Every part of the body has to work in unison with every other part. This is very important imagery of the Church as the body of Christ. Each member of the Body of Christ is given special gifts and talents … and they are different, as different as each person. The secret is to use these various gifts, these various talents, for the benefit of the whole body.”

This analogy of St. Paul’s teaches several important lessons, Bishop Foys said, about the Church as the Body of Christ — to rely on each other, to respect each other and to sympathize with each other.

“Each part of the body has its own essential job. Each part of the body has to be respected as being important. Then, as the body of Christ, we are called to sympathize with each other. St Paul says that beautiful statement, ‘If one part of the body suffers, the whole body suffers. And when one part of the body is honored every part of the body is honored,’” Bishop Foys said. “If we really take this image to heart and really and truly lived it just think how powerful, in the best sense of the word, the Body of Christ would be. There would be no division, there would be no dissention.”

Bishop Foys incenses the altar, which held relics of Sts. Peter and Paul, during the Solemn Vespers.

Bishop Foys acknowledged the various vocations of the people to whom the awards were being presented — priests, consecrated religious and lay faithful — all of which make up the Church. “We, together, are the Church, each following our own calling, the vocation that God has given us, and working together for the honor and glory of God.”

“Those we honor today have lived their life in service to the Lord fulfilling their own vocations, the vocations the Lord has given them, in communion with the entire Body of Christ. And, those we honor today are representative of everyone in our local diocese — the Church of Covington. Today we take the time out to say ‘thank you’ to the lay faithful, consecrated religious and priests who have truly been a witness to the faith and have, by their example, been a witness to others as to how we should live our lives.”

“My heart is filled with joy on this day and filled with gratitude. Everyone who is receiving this papal honor, it is my privilege to present this award to each of you, in the name of the Holy Father. It is a great day in the life of the Church in the Diocese of Covington — a day of good news, a day of celebration. I am so profoundly grateful to each of you.”

Recipients of the title ‘Chaplain to His Holiness’ and the Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice Cross

Chaplain to His Holiness
Chaplain to His Holiness (Msgr.) is an honor bestowed upon priests who have distinguished themselves in service and ministry to the Church and who are at least 65 years of age. The title is granted by the Holy Father.

Rev. Msgr. Ronald M. Ketteler
Rev. Msgr. Gerald L. Reinersman, V.F.
Rev. Msgr. Gerald E. Twaddell
Rev. Msgr. Daniel J. Vogelpohl

Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice Cross
The Pro-Ecclesia et Pontifice Cross is a papal award bestowed on clergy, religious and lay faithful in recognition of distinguished service given to the local and universal Church. It was established in 1888 by Pope Leo XIII.

Very Rev. Ryan L. Maher, V.G.
Very Rev. Daniel L. Schomaker, V.G.
Deacon Gerald R. Franzen

Sister Janet Marie Bucher, C.D.P.
Sister Celeste Marie Downes, S.J.W.
Mother Margaret Mary Fields, C.P.
Sister Marla Monahan, S.N.D.
Sister Frances Moore, C.D.P.
Mother Mary Christina Murray, S.J.W.
Sister Mary Ethel Parrott, S.N.D.
Sister Margaret Stallmeyer, C.D.P.
Sister Mary Catherine Wenstrup, O.S.B.

Mrs. Mary Brown
Mr. & Mrs. William and Anne Burleigh
Mr. & Mrs. William and Sue Butler
Mr. & Mrs. Charles and Mary Sue Deters
Mr. Timothy Fitzgerald
Mr. & Mrs. Mark and Casey Guilfoyle
Mr. Berry Mang
Mrs. Clare Quigley
Mrs. Karen Riegler
Mrs. Clare Ruehl
Ms. Margaret Schack

Annual Pro-Life Mass extended to parishes

Allegra Thatcher, Assistant Editor.

Respect Life month normally brings the faithful of the Diocese of Covington in October together to celebrate a diocesan-wide Mass in honor of the dignity of human life. Like most events, it’s looking a little different this year — and possibly reaching a different and wider audience.

The Pro-Life Mass is not only being celebrated at the Cathedral Basilica of the Assumption in Covington on Oct. 13, but also at each of the parishes in the diocese at the same time.

An image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, patroness of the unborn, at the 2019 Pro-Life Mass at the Cathedral Basilica of the Assumption.

Bishop Roger Foys will celebrate Mass in the Cathedral Basilica at 7 p.m. with representatives from each parish present. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Mass is not open to all those who would normally attend. However, every parish will be simultaneously celebrating a Mass at 7 p.m. and the faithful are invited to join at their parish to pray in union with the entire diocese.

Faye Roch, director of the Pro-Life Office, said the diocese has come together as a community every October since 1996 to kick off Respect Life month. “While our gathering to celebrate is different this year, my prayer is that these beautiful celebrations of the sanctity and dignity of life at our diocesan parishes will touch hearts and convert minds,” she said.

The opportunity to celebrate Mass closer to home and with a greater seating capacity than usual is one high point amid the changing times, and the Pro-Life Office hopes that more lives may be altered for the better by this year’s changes.

New cleaning machines to provide safe environment to learn

Allegra Thatcher, Assistant Editor.

Diocesan schools are taking extra measures to ensure confidence in sanitization this year, with a little help from the grant committee. St. Cecilia School, Independence, recently applied for a grant that will allow not only them but also nine other Catholic schools in the diocese access to two electrostatic sprayers and 10 cases of solution for quick and long-lasting disinfection of the school building.

Schools in the Diocese of Covington have been using machines like this one to disinfect surfaces and provide a safe and healthy environment. In this photo, Mrs. Hatter works hard to ensure that surfaces are disinfected and that students have a great experience in the cafeteria at Holy Cross School, Latonia. With the new electrostatic sprayer machines, staff won’t have to spend as much time cleaning or wiping down surfaces.

Kenny Collopy, principal, St. Cecilia School, said operationally everything is taking longer this year. “We’re sanitizing rooms between class periods and it’s constant cleaning of surfaces,” he said.
Their maintenance crew is one person, which led Mr. Collopy and his staff searching for ways to save time and make cleaning easier. Their school board has a new branch this year that focuses on grant writing. It’s a sub-committee of the school board that researches grants and looks for opportunities.

The branch, led by Karen Schultz, found that the school qualified for a grant from Horizon Community Fund for the sprayers, and they applied and were chosen. The HCF wanted to help as many schools as possible and included in the grant a provision that the equipment and solution would be shared with nine other neighboring schools. HCF provided the diocese with $4,209.30 to purchase the machines and solution.

The schools benefiting include: Blessed Sacrament School, Ft. Mitchell; Covington Latin School, Covington; Holy Cross School, Latonia; Holy Family School, Covington; Holy Trinity School, Bellevue; Prince of Peace School, Covington; St. Agnes School, Ft. Wright; St. Anthony School, Taylor Mill; St. Augustine School, Covington and St. Cecilia School.

Mr. Collopy said so far, St. Cecilia School has been using two different solutions: one that is spray and leave on, and one that requires a wipe down. The machines will eliminate the need for the wipe down, “so it allows our maintenance staff to get the common areas better,” he said. The solution is only applied once a month, which will allow each school the time to use the equipment effectively. “It will give us even more confidence that our building is even more sanitized than it has been.”

“We’re extremely thankful to Horizon for their providing the grant and their support of our school, helping keep us safe,” he said. “We’re also very grateful for our school board, which is made up of parents, and Karen Schultz and her efforts with our grant writing … keeping our students and staff as safe as possible.”

St. Vincent de Paul Society thanks dedicated volunteers for service

Allegra Thatcher, Assistant Editor.

The St. Vincent de Paul Society of Northern Kentucky held its annual feast day Mass and commitment ceremony Sept. 19 at St. Augustine Parish, Covington. Members gathered to celebrate the Eucharist and be honored for their years of service, as well as renew their commitment to helping those in need.

The Mass was celebrated by Bishop Roger Foys and concelebrated by Father Daniel Schomaker, vicar general and pastor, St. Augustine, Father Ryan Maher, vicar general and Father Michael Grady, parochial vicar. Deacons Mike Lyman and John Leardon served the Mass.

The Vincentians renew their promises to faithfully serve those in need.

After Mass, Bishop Foys installed George Everett as Eastern District vice president and Kristen Hildebrand as treasurer. All Vincentians then renewed their promises to assist the poor.

Casey Guilfoyle, board president, and Karen Zengel, executive director, presented awards to six deserving recipients. They honored jubilarians Norbert DeJaco for 25 years of service and Deacon Bill Theis for 20 years. Outgoing board members Maria Eichelberger, former secretary and Eastern District vice president, and Laurie Iglesias, former treasurer, were recognized for their service as well.

The Norbert F. DeJaco Vincentian Service Award, recognizing a Vincentian who has consistently gone above and beyond in their service to neighbors in need, went to Dawn Groneck of the St. Thomas Conference. A surprise award was given to Dennis Coyne, second vice president and former board president, to recognize him for his continued dedicated servant leadership to the Society as he continues to work tirelessly for those in need.

Bishop Foys blesses the congregation with a relic of St. Vincent de Paul.

Bishop Foys concluded the Mass and service with a blessing of the participants with a relic of St. Vincent de Paul.

“I am very grateful to all the members of the St. Vincent de Paul Society for what they do for God’s people both spiritually and materially,” said Bishop Foys. “They have always been a great help to those in need but never more than now during the pandemic. They give great witness to the Gospel message and give a good example for all of us to follow.”

Scratching the surface of ‘an inexhaustible mystery’

By David Cooley.

Under the direction of Bishop Roger Foys, the Office of Catechesis and Evangelization has teamed up with the Messenger to produce catechetical articles on the Eucharist. Long-term readers of the Messenger will recognize these articles since they were published previously. However, they have been re-structured here. This series on the Eucharist covers a variety topics, but, of course, with limited space and the fact that this is an exploration at the very center of theology, we are only scratching the surface. I hope that reading these short articles inspires you to explore more and to take every opportunity you are given to meet our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament.

Our faith is born from and expressed in theology (speech about God).  Theology, in turn, remains, as St. Anselm once defined it, a matter of “faith seeking understanding.” What we believe, we try to understand further; when we understand further, we believe more deeply. To grow in the faith means to engage in this cyclical process of seeking God. The reason we want to grow in faith is so that we can love God all the more.

Not long ago a Pew Research study reported that “Just one-third of U.S. Catholics agree with their Church that the Eucharist is the body, blood of Christ.”

This particular study noted that “ … nearly seven-in-ten Catholics (69 percent) say they personally believe that during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine used in Communion ‘are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ.’ Just one-third of U.S. Catholics (31 percent) say they believe that ‘during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine actually become the body and blood of Jesus.’”

This, understandably, caused shock waves to resound throughout the Church for anyone who was paying attention. However, there is reason to believe that we shouldn’t panic — yet. In this case, hopefully at least, things don’t seem to be as bad as they first appear. One factor to consider is sample size. The Disciple Maker Index, administered by the Catholic Leadership Institute, has currently surveyed 131,845 Catholics around the country about multiple themes connected with parish life.  (By contrast, the PEW survey was based on 1,835 Catholics in a total sample population of 10,971.)

When asked about doctrines of the faith, 72 percent of the DMI respondents strongly agreed with the statement “I personally believe the Eucharist really is the body and blood of Jesus Christ.” Another 19 percent agreed with that statement. That’s almost 120,000 Catholics claiming they do agree with what the Church teaches, compared to the 569 respondents highlighted in the PEW results.

Also, when considering the PEW survey, it has been pointed out that phraseology may have be an issue. The word “actually,” used in the Pew study, may have been interpreted as referring to a physical change, which would explain why few Catholics chose that response. If so, they were correct, in that the Church does not teach that there is a physical change in appearance.

In addition, John Bergsma, professor of theology at Franciscan University, Steubenville, Ohio, noted that many of the “self-identified” Catholics surveyed probably don’t show up at to Mass very often, if at all.

“Really what this poll shows, once again, is that there are large numbers of persons in the United States who consider themselves ‘Catholic’ almost as an ethnic or cultural category, because they received one or more sacraments when they were children, or their family is traditionally Catholic.

“However,” professor Bergsma said, “although these persons consider themselves ‘Catholic’ as a demographic category, they haven’t and don’t practice the Catholic faith, and they haven’t made much effort to learn what the Catholic Church teaches.”

My hope is that these observations help put this survey, and others like it, into perspective. This is important because there is a danger of such “shock-value” headlines becoming self-fulfilling prophesies. The more people feel alone in their beliefs the easier it is for doubt to take root in their hearts. Catholics believe in the True Presence — body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ — in the Eucharist; they always have and always will. But, that being said, there are still some hard realities that are worth taking a closer look at during these unprecedented times.

Long before the word “coronavirus” was part of our daily speech, our Catholic churches weren’t exactly over flowing with people on a weekly basis. With the exception of Christmas and, maybe, Easter, most people weren’t worried about arriving early to Mass so that they could find a seat. There are many factors and explanations for this that could be explored. But I think it’s fair to say that the general long-term trend in the Eastern and Northern parts of our country has been a steady decline in numbers.

Now, in the post-pandemic-of-2020 world, there is, understandably, anxiety among those who care for souls what Mass attendance numbers will look like when all of this is over, and what the long-term effects will be on the sacramental life of the Church. Being forced away from the sacraments, even if it was only for a short time, could easily cause confusion for the faithful, or even, God forbid, a notion that the sacraments are not needed for salvation. For believers, the Catechism of the Catholic Church does not mince words about this and affirms that “the sacraments of the New Covenant are necessary for salvation.” (n. 1129)

There’s a story about an evangelical Protestant preacher who once said, “If I truly believed what you Catholics say you believe, you would have to pull me away from the tabernacle. If I believed that my Lord was physically present in the church building I would never leave.” Now, of course, we can’t just stay in front of the tabernacle any more that Peter, James and John could stay up on the mountain with Jesus after he was transfigured (Mt. 17:1-10), but the message remains the same and the point is well taken. For us believers there is kind of a paradox: People don’t go to Mass because they don’t believe in the Real Presence, and they don’t believe in the Real Presence because if it were true, then wouldn’t the churches be full?

Like everything else in our lives, “it’s complicated.” But, here is one thing we can be sure of: Catholic theologians and teachers, as well as parents and Godparents, will always have work to do in communicating belief in the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist, since the notion and reality of transubstantiation remains “an inexhaustible mystery.” You have to start somewhere and these editions of the Messenger are the perfect place.

‘In the Beginning … ’ The Eucharist prefigured in the Old Testament

By Dr. Alma Burnette.

“In beginning created Elohim (…) the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 1:1

In the center of this verse, in Hebrew, is an untranslatable word, which is two Hebrew letters — the “aleph” and the “tav” — the first and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet. In Greek the letters are the Alpha and the Omega. It serves the grammatical purpose of being the direct object pointer. These two letters form a concept rather than an actual word. They represent all the words of God by which all things were spoken into existence, including the Eucharist. These two letters are peppered throughout the Old Testament, seasoning its meaning. The rabbis teach:

When the Messiah comes he will explain the meaning of the aleph and the tav. And he did in Revelation: “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end.” (Rev. 22:12) The same concept is in John 1:1.

When God made man, he made him out of the earth’s pre-created dust and breathed life into the lifeless form, bringing man into being by his previously spoken words, “Let us make man in our image.”

During the Mass the priest says, “Blessed are you, Lord, God of all creation. Through your goodness we have this bread to offer, which earth has given and human hands have made. It will become for us the bread of life. … Blessed are you, Lord, God of all creation. Through your goodness we have this wine to offer, fruit of the vine and work of human hands. It will become our spiritual drink.”

The priest is exercising his ordained authority to bring life to the lifeless bread and wine, previously made by human hands, fulfilling Christ’s previous words, “This is my body. … This is my blood.”

Just as the lifeless form of the first Adam, became a living soul so the lifeless form of the bread and wine become the body, blood, soul and divinity of the second Adam, Christ.

In Genesis 2 God causes a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and from his side comes forth Eve. Adam exclaims, “This is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh.” God allowed Christ to die, a deep sleep for his body, and his side, too, was opened (pierced) for the Church to come forth. St. Paul writes, “Because we are members of his body we are of his flesh and of his bone.” (Eph 5:30) How so? By the Eucharist being consumed at the Mass, the marriage supper of the Lamb.

In Genesis 2 and 3 the two trees planted in the middle of the garden foreshadow the Eucharist. It was a rabbi who once explained it to me.

The fruit of the trees was manna. The tree of life had unleavened manna and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil had leavened manna, both heavenly bread.” Evidence of this is found in Genesis 3:19: “In the sweat of your face shalt thou eat bread …”

The word “fruit” means more than apples, oranges or figs. It means “the product of,” like “fruit of the womb.” Adam and Eve never prepared food before disobeying God. The couple only ate from the trees, not from anything that grew from the ground, such as grain. Now, after the disobedience, Adam would work to obtain bread, and since, it did not require work before, it had to be a product of a tree — the tree of life.

With this understanding, the text in John 6:5 and Romans 5 becomes more clear. Death came into the world by the first Adam eating outside of the will of God, from the tree of knowledge of good and evil (the Law); life comes into the world by eating according to the will of God, Christ’s flesh and blood — the Eucharist, the fruit of the tree of life we call the Cross. Both are heavenly bread. The Jews prophesized that when the Messiah came he would elevate the meaning of the manna.

Eucharistic prefiguration continues throughout Genesis: the blood of Able “cries out” … fulfilled in Hebrews 12:24 where Jesus’s blood speaks; Noah planting a vineyard and grain after the flood and being permitted to eat clean animals … animals originally only for sacrifice now allowed by eating to become bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh; Abraham receiving from Melchizedek bread and wine; Jacob clothes himself in Esau’s clothes (Incarnation) and receiving the inheritance which included grain for bread and plenty of wine, that Esau, the first son (Adam) sold; Joseph depending on Pharaoh’s bread maker and cupbearer for deliverance. One died, one lived — death and resurrection in the Eucharist. Later Joseph reveals himself to his brothers after placing a cup into the grain. This led to their confession, reconciliation and the salvation of the world through grain for bread distribution.

Moses is a type (a prefiguration) of Christ. Both were born at a time when oppressors were killing Hebrew babies. Both had unusual first cribs. Both of them were raised by a man who was not their natural father. Both were God’s appointed delivers. Both were intercessors. Both offered their own lives to save the people. Both fasted 40 days and nights. Both gave up great riches to serve. Both, at their first appearance, were rejected by their own people. Both proclaimed commandments. Both provided food and drink. The list could go on and on.

There are many Eucharistic connections between the first Exodus in the Old Testament and the second Exodus brought on by Jesus.

Moses’ first public miracle was changing water to blood. Jesus’ first public miracle was changing water to wine, a forerunner of the greater miracle of changing wine to his own blood. Moses was the first priest to represent all the people. In this new position, he proclaims the Torah to the people. Jesus, the High Priest, proclaims and also fulfilled the Torah during his three-year ministry — the same number of years it takes to read through the Torah reading cycle in synagogues. After proclaiming the Torah, Moses threw the blood of the sacrifice on the people saying, “Behold the blood of the covenant which the Lord has made for you.” The priest during the Mass lifts the consecrated host and wine and says, “Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world … ”

Moses publicly consecrates Aaron, which began the priesthood (Kohanim succession) that continues to this day. All Kohens must trace their authority back to Aaron’s consecration. Only these men and the other Levites were permitted to offer sacrifices and other priestly duties for the people. This is what Jesus did with the institution of the Twelve for apostolic succession. Only they and those they ordain have the authority to offer the Mass, announce forgiveness, etc.

The Levitical men, while serving as priests, though most were married, had to be celibate for the weeks they served as priests (five non-consecutive weeks per year, see I Samuel 21:1-5; Leviticus 15:18, 22:4). Priests ordained in the New Testament serve year-round. Peter, a married Jew, probably abstained (I Corinthians 7:5-7) before offering the sacrifice of the Mass. The lay priesthood does not have to be celibate because they are the receivers of the sacrifice, not the ones who offer.

The manna in the wilderness is explained in John 6. The manna is related to the unleavened “Bread of the Presence,” also translated the “Bread of the Faces” (plural), which was commanded to be on a table in the Holy Place in the Tabernacle (and the future Temple) perpetually. It foreshadowed Christ’s presence as the bread, the visible yet invisible face of God (Exodus 25:23-30; Leviticus 24:5-7; Numbers 4:7; John 14:9).

The Passover feast is a monumental foreshadowing of the Eucharist. In this article, I will only touch on details normally not covered elsewhere. For instance, the way the blood of the lamb was strategically smeared on the doors: they poured the blood, not in a basin as translated, but in a dugout hole in the threshold of the door. They dipped the hyssop into the blood, applied it to the two side posts and on the lintel (top) of each door. By observation, one could see the result of the smearing as an upright version of the Paleo Hebrew letter TAV. This letter means: the finish, the covenant, the mark, the sign and the signature (Exodus 12:13). The Hebrew letter looks like two crossed sticks — a cross, a cross with blood on it in the same location as the blood on Jesus’ cross.

The Last Supper Jesus had with his disciple was probably not the Passover meal itself. The reason: the Passover lambs had not yet been sacrificed; Jesus had to die with the Passover lambs to fulfill the typology, which began with his birth (all Passover lambs during the second temple period had to be born in Bethlehem). The meal celebrated the evening before the Passover lambs were sacrificed was probably the Todah sacrificial meal (Leviticus 7:12-15, 22). “Todah” in Hebrew means “thanksgiving”; in Greek the word is “Eucharistia.” It could be any time of the year as often as desired and was often eaten on the evenings surrounding the actual Passover night. The Todah meal was to give thanks for individual or family deliverance from peril or death. The Passover meal was a collective Todah meal designated for all Israel to eat together on one specific night, once a year, to celebrate a national deliverance.

The Todah meals had lamb, unleavened bread, cups of wine, prayers and hymns (the Hallel psalms are Todah psalms). The Todah sacrifice is considered the greatest of the animal sacrifices because it added suffering of one’s own life (see Psalm 69:30). The Todah is a subcategory of the peace offerings (Leviticus 7:12-15), the only sacrifice non-priests are permitted to share in its sacrificial meal. The Todah offering was listed in the passage about the seventy-four being called to go up the mountain with Moses (Exodus 24:1-11). While there, they beheld God as they ate and drank. So too, on the night before the official Passover, the Twelve Apostles were called to go up with Jesus to an upper room. There they beheld God (Jesus) as they ate and drank. From that night on his body, blood, soul and divinity sacrifice would be called the Eucharist — Todah in Hebrew.

If the Lord’s Supper was the Todah meal and not the yearly Passover meal, we have an explanation as to why the first Christians, who were Jews, immediately began celebrating this sacrificial meal weekly, and sometimes daily, instead of once a year. The ancient rabbis believed that after the Messiah comes all sacrifices except the Todah would cease. They were correct! Today, at the end of the Mass, the congregation exclaims, “Thanks be to God” — in Hebrew, “Todah laEl.”

The foreshadowing of the Eucharist continues in the rest of the Old Testament. The following observations are only brief reflections and barely scratch the surface.

First, let’s consider the two great harvests of Israel — the spring harvest of grain and the fall harvest of mostly grapes and olives — bread, wine and oil. In Leviticus 23:12-13 God unites bread and wine, priests who anoint with oil and the sacrifice of the lamb.

Next, David is a type of Jesus starting with his birth in Bethlehem (House of Bread), and his being chosen by God for the dual role of king and priest — a priestly-king in the order of Melchizedek, the one who brought bread and wine to Abraham (Heb 7:17 quoting Psalm 110:40). There are also many Eucharistic images written by David in the psalms, such as Psalm 23, which contains the Eucharistic prophecy: “Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of my enemies.” It is interesting to note that this psalm follows Psalm 22 — the passion psalm.

Now comes Elijah in the wilderness. (I Kgs 19:6) While in the wilderness, Elijah was awakened by an angel and found prepared for him bread in the shape of a cake and a jar of water. The bread in the shape of a cake is like the host of the holy Eucharist. The jar of water foreshadows the water turned to wine at Cana.

After the prophet Elijah comes Elisha, who miraculously feeds a hundred men with a small amount of food, a type of loaves and fishes miracle, which prefigured Jesus multiplying himself in the Eucharist.

All this is followed by Isaiah’s prophecies and his vision in chapter 7, the chapter where a coal of fire is taken from the fiery altar of God and is touched to Isaiah’s lips. The fiery coal is a prefiguration of the Host. This allusion is referred to in Church liturgies, especially in the Orthodox Liturgy of St. James where Communion is described as “receiving the fiery coal,” due to its cleansing of Isaiah to prepare him for his mission.

Another pre-Eucharistic episode is found in the vision of Ezekiel eating the scroll with the written Word of God on it — a scroll made edible (Ezek 2). This vision is experienced in the two parts of the Mass. In the first part, the Liturgy of the Word, we hear the written Word through the proclamations, we see the written Word before our eyes, and then we prepare to partake of the Word through the homily. In the second part, the Liturgy of the Eucharist, we eat the Word of God — the Word made flesh, the Word made edible.

Dr. Alma Burnette is a parishioner at St. Paul Parish, Florence. She has a master’s degree in theology and a Ph.D. in Biblical studies. She is a writer, speaker, teacher and graphic designer. She is currently the president of Word Truths Ministries and a media assistant at Holmes High School.

Real Presence in the Eucharist

By Father Jeffrey VonLehmen.

In the Gospels Jesus says, “This is my body” and “This is my blood.” What does that mean to each of us?

How is Jesus present in the Eucharist? Most of us, at one time or another, find ourselves either asking that question or trying to explain the mystery for someone else. Catholics believe that the Body and Blood of Jesus are present in consecrated bread and wine. We do not say the Eucharist is like the Body and Blood of Jesus, but that it is the Body and Blood of Jesus.

In the Gospels, Jesus says, “This is my body,” and “This is my blood.” That is strong language. It is language Christians have sought to understand for many centuries. In the Eucharist, we proclaim the mystery of faith. And it is a mystery! But the mystery of the kingdom of God and the Eucharist is meant to be obvious although it cannot be reduced to human logic. Sometimes, what is most obvious is most overlooked.

I invite you to look at the obvious — our ordinary human experiences — to help make sense of the Eucharist and Real Presence. Why does it make sense for Catholics to believe in what traditionally has been called transubstantiation (the changing of the whole substance of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ)? Why is it important to say that the Eucharist is a concrete encounter of the community with Jesus and not just a spiritual thing between an individual and God? In our own human experience, we can discover why real presence and the body-and-blood presence of Christ are important to us and to God.

Flesh and Blood Relationships

We often think of spiritual as invisible. But who wants an invisible relationship with a loved one?

Consider this example. A father leaves work early on a weekday, drives five hours to another city to be present at his son’s college basketball game, and then drives home the same night. The father arrives home about 5 a.m., catches an hour of sleep, and then goes to work.

He does this often. Perhaps it would be enough to tell his son over the phone that he is thinking about him and cheering and praying for him. But think how much more it means to the child that his father is not just there in spirit — he is there in flesh. He is providing real presence for his son. What a big difference!

When we love someone, we want a concrete relationship, and the loving Spirit of God always seeks a body-and-blood relationship with us. That’s what we celebrate in the Incarnation at Christmas and in the death and resurrection of Jesus on Good Friday and Easter.

The Spirit dwells in us so we might experience God, who wants a real relationship with us. We need a body-and-blood relationship with God in Christ. Yet we can only begin to understand the body and blood of Jesus when we understand true love in relationships involving friends, family and marriage.

Sacrifice and Life

Think in terms of word associations. When I say “green” someone might think of grass. When I say “blue,” one might think of the sky. In our culture, when someone says “blood,” we probably think of something terrible, of violence or loss of life. When we hear about body and blood as sacrifice, as in the sacrifice of the Mass, we think somebody or something has been killed. But in the ancient Hebrew mentality, if an animal was sacrificed to God, the people did not think the animal was killed to appease an angry God. Instead, they thought of blood as the presence of life. Sacrifice was not so much giving up their best lamb or the first and best part of their crop. Sacrifice meant communion of life.

This brings to mind the wonderful image of an infant in the mother’s womb. The infant is being nourished through the umbilical cord by the body and blood of the mother. The baby is receiving life! The mother’s body is making all kinds of changes and sacrifices for the infant in her womb, and the mother is very conscious of the communion she has with her infant. The bond between mother and baby is truly a body-and-blood relationship.

The bond between God, our loving parent, and us is just as strong and concrete. God wants a body-and-blood relationship with us, and this concrete relationship is made possible in Christ. God so loved the world that he sent his only Son. Christ’s sacrifice in becoming one like us in the Incarnation and in his passion on the Cross establishes a communion of life, a real presence in which we are assured that God desires us as much as we desire him.

The bread and wine are not simply like the body and blood of Christ they are the body-and-blood presence of Christ. This is because our relationship is that concrete, that real, that wonderful! Jesus is God revealing God’s self to us. Neither God nor we want an invisible relationship — we want the real thing!

We can increase our understanding of God’s presence during the Eucharistic prayer and Communion by thinking about being in the womb of God where we are fed concretely through the umbilical cord of the Holy Spirit.

Demonstrating the importance of this sacrament, a Catholic visionary once said, “If I had a choice between a vision and the Eucharist, I would choose the Eucharist.” Truly the Eucharist is a real, interpersonal encounter between God and the worshiping community precisely because Christ is body-and-blood present. Our human experiences of love and relationships tell us that any lover seeks concrete union with the beloved.

The love expressed in the Eucharist is as old as Christmas. It is like the love between a mother and her infant in the womb. It is the love of God in Christ for his people not yet fully born into the reign of God: ” … the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world, … Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.” (John 6:5l-56)

The Different Modes of Christ’s Presence

In order that they should achieve a deeper understanding of the mystery of the Eucharist, the faithful should be instructed in the principal ways in which the Lord is present to his Church in liturgical celebrations.

He is always present in a body of the faithful gathered in his name (see Matt 18:20). He is present, too, in his Word, for it is he who speaks when the Scriptures are read in the Church.

In the sacrifice of the Eucharist he is present both in the person of the minister, “the same now offering through the ministry of the priest who formerly offered himself on the cross,” and above all under the species of the Eucharist. For in this sacrament Christ is present in a unique way, whole and entire, God and man, substantially and permanently. The Sacred Congregation of Rites, instruction on the Worship of Eucharistic Ministry, sates that this presence of Christ under the species “is called ‘real’ not in an exclusive sense, as if the other kinds of presence were not real, but par excellence.” (Sacred Congregation of Rites, instruction on the Worship of Eucharistic Ministry, no.9)

The Body of Christ

There is no doubt that a body-and-blood relationship exists between a mother and her child. But they don’t think of each other as body and blood. They think about the human relationship between them, whether or not it is a mutually loving relationship. It’s the same way in the Eucharistic celebration. We have a body-and-blood relationship with God in Christ. In this encounter, we no longer get stuck on the elements of bread and wine, Body and Blood. This is because we experience persons instead of things, relationships instead of magic. Real reverence has to be for the person of Christ and for all people for whom he died — the two are inseparable. That is why people are called the body of Christ.

We cannot have reverence for the Body and Blood of Christ — the person of Christ — if we knock down those for whom he died out of love. For this reason, people are the body of Christ. Scripture always says it so well: “Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.” (Matt 25:45) “If anyone says, ‘l love God,’ but hates his brother, he is a liar.” (1 John 4:20) In speaking of the condemnation of the unjust steward, Matthew’s Gospel says, “So will my heavenly Father do to you, unless each of you forgives his brother from his heart.” (Matt 18:35)

It is simple: we must have reverence for one another. We cannot help but want a community of compassion, mercy, peace and justice. We recognize that we all come form the same womb of God, the love of God poured out into our hearts through the outpouring of the Holy Spirit signed and sealed in the body-and-blood relationship we have in Christ.

Father Jeffrey VonLehmen is pastor at St. Patrick Parish, Taylor Mill.

The Truth is ‘Out There’

By Deacon Timothy Britt.

There is a show on T.V. called “The X Files.” It’s about two F.B.I. agents who investigate strange and unexplained events, like ghosts and UFOs. The show’s tagline is “the truth is out there.”

I always thought of that tagline as saying that there was a rational explanation for all the mysteries that the agents were investigating. The answers the agents were searching for, basically the truth, would eventually be found because it was “out there” — somewhere.

Of course, there is another way of looking at that expression “out there.” It’s something that people say, sometimes, when they’re talking about something or someone who is unconventional, unorthodox or eccentric. It’s what people mean when they say that the truth is stranger than fiction or when they ask, “is this guy for real?”

As Catholics we cannot deny that the truth that we present to the world is “out there.” Jesus himself did not deny it, or at least he expected that some people would find the truth too hard to accept. Following what we call “the bread of life discourse” in John’s Gospel, many of his disciples said, “This saying is hard;” (aka, This teaching is “out there”) “Who can accept it?” and many of them returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.

Even today, many find our teaching on the Eucharist too out there. It is a stumbling block too confounding to get around or over. Two people can look at the same thing and see two entirely different things. Like an optical illusion, some of us might squint and strain and still not see what is said to be right before our eyes. The plate of what used to be bread and the cup of what used to be wine for some continue to appear to be nothing more than bread and wine. Like Pontius Pilate, we ask, “What is truth?” while truth himself stands before us.

Following Jesus’ introduction of himself as bread for the life of the world, as he watched so many followers walk away, Jesus asked the Twelve, “Do you want to leave too?” To which Simon Peter replied, “Lord, to whom would we go? You have the words of eternal life. We believe and know that you are the holy one of God.”

It wasn’t that what he was telling them was any easier for them to swallow than it was for those who left; it was simply that they believed in him. They trusted their friend. The truth was out there, but Jesus was close enough to touch. Jesus said it was true and so they came to recognize that Jesus himself was present — body, blood, soul and divinity — in the Blessed Sacrament. A hymn that I remember from my youth encourages us to “Look beyond the bread you eat; see your Savior and your Lord. Look beyond the cup you drink; see his love poured out as blood.”

The truth is out there, but Jesus is close enough to touch. Moreover, in the Blessed Sacrament we actually become a part of him. And so it happens that the truth that is somewhere out there is actually very close by. It has been placed on our hearts and written on our minds.

Deacon Timothy Britt is assigned to St. Mary Parish, Alexandria, Ky.

Sacrifices of 9/11 and pandemic are a call to examine conscience, live differently

Laura Keener, Editor.

In the quiet, peaceful moments before Mass, a single candle glowed, Friday, Sept. 11, before an icon of Our Lady of Sorrows as she wrapped her mantel around the twin towers of New York’s World Trade Center as smoke billowed from its top floors. The Oratory of St. Paul at the Diocese of Covington Curia was prepared for a memorial Mass on the 19th anniversary of the worst terrorist attack on United States soil.

Instead of the green vestments for Ordinary Time, Bishop Roger Foys, celebrant, and Father Jordan Hainsey and Father Michael Norton, concelebrants, wore purple vestments — the color of penance and sacrifice. The Mass was being offered for the preservation of peace and justice for all those who died as a result of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as well as for all those have died from COVID-19 and for all police officers, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, nurses and doctors.

“Everyone here remembers where you were on that day when the planes hit the New York towers and the Pentagon and the empty field in Pennsylvania,” Bishop Foys said as he began his homily.

Bishop Foys described the days following the terrorist attack as days of “renewed enthusiasm and patriotism” with churches filled. “But the enthusiasm and patriotism and the coming together of our nation as one, our churches filled with prayers to the almighty, have passed,” he said.

The terrorist attack on our nation was and is, Bishop Foys said, “horrific and there can never be any justification for it. It was criminal, it was sinful.”

But he said, the terrorist attack, like the current COVID-19 pandemic, is an opportunity that calls for an examination of conscience “as a nation and as individuals.”

“What is it in our nation, in our life, in our lifestyle that would cause someone to do something so horrific?” he asked.

Reflecting on the day’s Gospel reading, Bishop Foys said, “Jesus, in the Gospel message, said, why remove the splinter from your brother’s eye when you have a beam in your own? Remove the beam first from your own eye.

“When we point out someone else’s fault we don’t have to do anything, we don’t have to change. But when we look into our own consciouses and our own hearts for our own faults … it’s more difficult because we may have to change,” he said.

In the early days of the pandemic, Bishop Foys recalled Pope Francis addressing the people of the world from the balcony in St. Peter’s Square before an empty piazza, trying to make sense of the pandemic. He said, “This pandemic is not a punishment from God but, perhaps, it’s a call for us to live differently.” Of all the words he has ever written and said, those are some of the most important, Bishop Foys said.

“God doesn’t exact punishments like this, but he does call us to live a different way,” he said. “During this pandemic, in our country and our own diocese, we hear from people how they have the right not to wear a mask or follow other restrictions. ‘I don’t care about your rights. I don’t care about your well-being. I have the right to do what I want,’” he said.

“Nineteen years, what have we learned? Where are the flags? Where is the patriotism? Where are the churches filled with people begging God to lift this scourge from us — begging God to make us one nation under God?” he said.

Bishop Foys asked the Curia members present to pray especially for the police. “What has happened to the reverence and the esteem to which we held those first responders that day? I can remember seeing the firefighters, police, EMTs and first responders, how many of them gave up or risked their lives for others. And now, 19 years later, these very same people are vilified — they are the enemy. I have heard them being described as a cancer on our nation; our police men and women! Who defend us! Where is our fault in all of this? Are we afraid to examine our consciences?”

“Today we remember those 2,996 people who died and the people who are still suffering from their injuries. May that remembrance call us to change the way we live. If it does not, those 2,996 people died in vain and all those policemen and women, firefighters, EMTs and first responders risked their lives in vain.”

Bishop Foys ended his homily imploring for God’s mercy.

“We offer this Mass for all those who have died in Nine-eleven, for all those who were injured, for all those who have died of the coronavirus and for all the police, firefighters, EMTs, doctors and nurses. We pray also for all those who are hard of heart and do not accept this pandemic for what it is; who will not take the precautions we are called to make — if not for our own sake but for the sake and safety of others,” Bishop Foys said. “Nine-eleven was a dark day in the history of our nation. Unfortunately, we have made it darker by our behavior since then. God have mercy on us.”

The Church has been here before and done amazing things

By David Cooley.

It seems like a growing number of people that I’ve spoken to lately are having a difficult time finding joy in life. This worries me, especially as fall creeps in and the cold months of winter get closer. Many people seem down, cynical, defeated and tired of the way things have been this year. Anxieties are even higher than usual as tough decisions and sacrifices are being asked of almost everybody. These feelings are all very understandable in the midst of the coronavirus, ongoing restrictions, civil turmoil, natural disasters, unnatural disasters and an election season. But, what’s needed in times like these? The answer is always the same — supernatural faith.

As Catholics, we are at our best when we are desperate for God. A first, that statement might seem obvious or strange. But think about it, in the United States, in the 21st century, besides occasions of personal grief, recognizing our desperation for God is not something that we as a community do very often. But the truth is always the same — without God, we can do nothing (cf. John 15:4-6). When we seek God’s help we can do amazing things. We need God, the world needs our prayers and we need each other. Our troubles are numerous, but we have a lot to hold onto — our Catholic worldview for one thing, and, most importantly, the sacraments instituted by Christ, by which we get the graces we need.

This is a good time for us to get our priorities straight. The question we need to ask ourselves is this: What is God asking us to do — as individuals and as a Church — in this time? Sometimes it feels like our hands are tied and we can’t do anything, but I am sure the answers will come in the silence of prayer. There are plenty of opportunities to be Christ for others and to bring others to Christ.

I recently read an inspiring document produced by Word on Fire, entitled “Catholicism in the time of Coronavirus.” It was written by Dr. Stephen Bullivant, a former Oxford researcher and Fellow of the Word on Fire Institute, and in it he tackles the questions of what the long-term impact of this pandemic might be, not only on our spiritual lives but also on the Church’s institutions and its mission of evangelization. While there were many good and practical aspects to this piece, I found myself really intrigued by the historical perspective he presents.

Dr. Bullivant notes some dark points in Church history, times when the world faced grave illnesses that wreaked terror throughout the known world, and not for one year but many years. For example, in 250 AD the Church’s records gives us a first-hand testimony from St. Cyprian, bishop of Carthage, who writes of the horrible symptoms that people experienced during an outbreak. Another bishop, contemporary of Cyprian, St. Dionysius of Alexandria, wrote, “Now, indeed, everything is tears, and everyone is mourning, and wailings resound daily through the city because of the multitude of the dead and dying.”

What’s extraordinary is how early Christians responded to this pandemic and how later generations of Christians followed in their footsteps. These actions resulting in Christianity spreading throughout the known world. While the pagans abandoned their friends, left the dead unburied and fled, the Christians took care of those in most need. History shows us that it was both the early martyrs and the faithful who showed extraordinary love that paved the way for Church to flourish in spite of having the odds stacked against her. “Selfless heroism won both admiration and converts,” writes Dr. Bullivant. Another term for this “selfless heroism” is true charity — love.

One of the most striking examples of true charity, to me, was St. Charles Borromeo in the 16th century. A plague descended on Milan and he was the city’s bishop. To fund the city’s relief effort he sold everything he had, took up a collection and persuaded those who could to give generously. He found ways to make sure that people’s material and spiritual needs were taken care of. He created jobs and hospitals and quarantine houses. He rescued orphaned infants and made sure they received the love and attention they required.

The salvation of souls was always St. Charles’ number one priority. At the peak of the epidemic when churches were closed and people were confined to their houses, St. Charles erected outdoor altars all around town for daily Mass. The people prayed from their windows. He and his clergy instituted door-to-door confessions and a home-delivery program for the Eucharist on Sundays. He even organized a number of activities and resources to help his flock lead lives of piety and virtue — he was worried about possible temptations in all that idle time.

Obviously we live in different times, but we’ve seen many parallels of St. Charles’ actions during the current pandemic. His story, among others, serves as a reminder of what we can accomplish if we have unwavering faith. It’s true that he was a bishop, but you don’t have to be a bishop. The clergy cannot do it alone.

Reading about Catholic history and what others have done during extraordinarily difficult times has inspired me to think creatively of how I, personally, can affect the lives of other people in a positive way. It doesn’t have to be world-changing, it can be something small — talking with someone who is lonely, helping a neighbor who is in a bind, sending a hand-written letter. Just letting people know you care can be so important and reminds them about God’s love and providence in their lives. Imagine the impact on the world if every Catholic devoted themselves to doing small acts of love every day. If we keep our eyes fixed on the Lord we can become a beacon of hope for others. Right now, we are the disciples in a boat on a stormy sea and Jesus is asking us: “Where is your faith?” (cf. Matthew 8:23–27, Mark 4:35–41, and Luke 8:22–25).

David Cooley is co-director and office manager of the Office of Catechesis and Evangelization.